|
References Used to Develop Tips & Tools: VBAC or Repeat C-Section
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal birth
after previous cesarean delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin 2004, No 54.
Anderson
GC, Moore E, Hepworth J, Bergman N. Early skin-to-skin contact for
mothers and their healthy newborn infants (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2004.
Bujold E, Bujold C, Hamilton EF, Harel F, Gauthier RJ. The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(6):1326-30.
Chestnut
DH, Vandewalker GE, Owen CL, Bates JN, Choi WW. The influence of
continuous epidural bupivacaine analgesia on the second stage of labor
and method of delivery in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology 1987;66(4):774-80.
Devoe
LD, Croom CS, Youssef AA, Murray C. The prediction of "controlled"
uterine rupture by the use of intrauterine pressure catheters. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80(4):626-9.
Eddleston
JM, Maresh M, Horsman EL, Young H, Lacey P, Anderton J. Comparison of
the maternal and fetal effects associated with intermittent or
continuous infusion of extradural analgesia. Br J Anaesth 1992;69(2):154-8.
Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E, Hofmeyr J. Hospital practices. In: A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, 3rd ed. Oxford: University of Oxford Press, 2000, pp. 255-66. [Click for PDF.]
Guise J-M, Berlin M, McDonagh M, Osterweil P, Chan B, Helfand M. Safety of vaginal birth after cesarean: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103(3):420-9.
Guise
J-M, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan BKS, Helfand M.
systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture
in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 2004;329:159-65.
Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(5 suppl):S160-72.
Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr G J, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth [PDF]. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003766. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.
Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2004.
International
Lactation Consultant Association. Evidence-based guidelines for
breastfeeding management during the first fourteen days, April 1999.
Jackson
DJ, Lang JM, Ecker J, Swartz WH, Heeren T. Impact of collaborative
management and early admission in labor on method of delivery. JOGNN 2003;32:147-57.
Kaplan B, Royburt M, Peled Y, Hirsch M, Hod M, Ovadia Y, Neri A. Routine revision of uterine scar after prior cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994;73(6):473-5.
Kaufman KE, Bailit JL, Grobman W. Elective induction: an analysis of economic and health consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:858-63.
Klein
MC, Kelly A, Kaczorowski J, Grzybowski S. The effect of family
physician timing of maternal admission on procedures in labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2004;26(7):641-5.
Lieberman E. Risk factors for uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2001;44(3):609-21.
Lieberman
E, Ernst EK, Rooks JP, Stapleton S, Flamm B. Results of the national
study of vaginal birth after cesarean in birth centers. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104(5):933-42.
Mardirisoff
C, Dumont L, Boulvain M, Tramer MR. Fetal bradycardia due to
intrathecal opioids for labour analgesia: a systematic review. BJOG 2002;109(3):274-81.
Childbirth
Connection. Comparing risks of cesarean and vaginal birth to mothers,
babies, and future reproductive capacity: a systematic review. New
York: Childbirth Connection, April 2004. [The following study documents
are available as PDF files from the Childbirth Connection website: description of methods and sources (including full bibiliography), list of main questions and outcomes (a table of contents for evidence tables), first file of evidence tables, and second file of evidence tables. Latter includes pelvic floor outcomes.]
National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health [U.K.]. Caesarean section. Commissioned by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. London: RCOG Press, April 2004.
Rodriguez MH, Masaki DI, Phelan JP, Diaz FG. Uterine rupture: are intrauterine pressure catheters useful in the diagnosis? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161(3):666-9.
Ryding EL. Investigation of 33 women who demanded a cesarean section for personal reasons. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993;72:280-5.
Saisto
T, Salmela-Aro K, Nurmi JE, Kononen T, Halmesmaki E. A randomized
controlled trial of intervention in fear of childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:820-6.
G.D. Searle & Co. Cytotec® (misoprostol). Chicago: G.D. Searle & Co., [2002] [FDA "label".]
Silberstein
T, Wiznitzer A, Katz M, Friger M, Mazor M. Routine revision of uterine
scar after cesarean: has it ever been necessary? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998;78(1):29-32.
Simkin P, O'Hara M. Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: Systematic reviews of five methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(5 suppl):S131-59.
Sjogren B, Thomassen P. Obstetric outcome in 100 women with severe anxiety over childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997:76:948-952.
Society
of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, Clinical Practice
Obstetrics Committee. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous
caesarean birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2004;26(7):660-70.
Stavrou C, Hofmeyr GJ, and Boezaart AP. Prolonged fetal bradycardia during epidural analgesia. S Afr Med J 1990;77(2):66-8.
Go
Most recent page update: 11/21/2011
© 2013 Childbirth Connection. All rights reserved.
Childbirth Connection is a national not-for-profit organization founded in 1918 as Maternity Center Association. Our mission is to improve the quality and value of maternity care through consumer engagement and health system transformation. Childbirth Connection promotes safe, effective and satisfying evidence-based maternity care and is a voice for the needs and interests of childbearing families.
|
News and Features

Listening to MothersSM III is the third national
survey exploring women’s experiences in pregnancy and childbirth.
Commissioned by Childbirth Connection, conducted by Harris Interactive, and
funded by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, the survey polled 2,400 women who gave
birth in U.S. hospitals from 2011 to 2012. Results show that medically
intensive experiences are typical, and evidence-based practices are
underutilized. Childbearing women need better support and knowledge to
navigate their maternity care.
Access the full report and supplementary materials New Report: Maternity Care and
LiabilityGo to
report and supporting materials New Report: The Cost of Having a Baby in the United
StatesGo to report
and supporting materials New Cesarean Resources:Go to Best Evidence Report Go to web pages and booklet for women
For 95 years, Childbirth Connection has been dedicated to improving the
quality and value of maternity care for all women and their families. Learn
more about our rich history through our interactive
timeline and give
$95 for 95 in honor of
our 95th birthday.
Childbirth Connection works to ensure that all women and babies get the best
possible maternity care. We have the collective vision and we know how to get
there, but we can't do it alone. Join the transformation
today.
Help Transform Maternity Care!
Please join our efforts to make quality
maternity care a top national priority. Your support will help make the
transformation possible.
|