|
Cochrane Review on Effects of Continuous Labor Support
A new systematic review of the effects of continuous labor support was published in Issue 3, 2003 of The Cochrane Library. As Childbirth Connection is a partial supporter of this work, the review is available here, in full and without charge (click for a PDF). This page provides a brief overview.
Background to this systematic reviewThis new review is
descended from the first systematic review of controlled trial research
of effects of labor support, which appeared in Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth
(1989). The current version replaces the Cochrane Review that Ellen
Hodnett kept up-to-date from 1995 through 2003: "Caregiver Support for
Women During Childbirth." That review contributed to the development of
policy statements and guidelines, legislation, and programs promoting
continuous labor support in various countries throughout the world.
What's new?
The
new review adheres to established Cochrane Collaboration procedures for
limiting bias, including a thorough strategy for identifying relevant
studies, elimination of relevant studies that are not methodologically
adequate, and meta-analytic summary of remaining "included studies,"
when appropriate. The current version differs in several ways from the
one it replaces:
- new team: joining Dr. Hodnett, the lead reviewer, are
co-authors bringing perspectives on statistics/methodology (Simon
Gates), conditions in resource-constrained nations (Justus Hofmeyr),
and consumer concerns (Carol Sakala, Childbirth Connection's Director
of Programs)
- new title: "Continuous Support for Women During Childbirth"
- new protocol: the team began by developing a detailed formal
plan specifying the criteria and procedures they would follow to
prepare the new review
- new randomized controlled trials (RCTs): two new large RCTs
were incorporated; the new review summarizes experiences of nearly
13,000 women who participated in 15 trials that took place in 11
countries
- expanded background and discussion sections: new topics
include explanations for effect of continuous labor support, growth of
availability and use of doulas or trained labor support companions, and
questions about effects of different types of providers of labor
support
- new subgroup analyses: the team included several new subgroup analyses comparing effects of continuous support under various conditions.
Research questionsThe main objective ("main
comparison") was to assess the effects, on mothers and their babies, of
continuous one-to-one support during labor compared with usual care, in
any setting.
Subgroup analyses were planned to compare effects of continuous labor support with different
- policies about companions of the women's own choice: whether the study did or did not take place in a setting that allowed women to bring partners and other companions of choice
- policies about epidural analgesia: whether epidural was or was not routinely available
- policies about continuous electronic fetal monitoring (EFM): whether continuous EFM was or was not routine
- types of caregivers: whether the caregiver was a member of the hospital staff (e.g., nurse, midwife or student midwife) or someone from outside
- timing in the onset of continuous support: whether the support did or did not begin before active labor.
Outcomes of interestThe review identifies 30 outcomes of interest for the main comparison:
- labor events: e.g., artificial oxytocin, epidural analgesia
- birth events: e.g., cesarean birth, episiotomy
- newborn events: e.g., low 5-minute Apgar score, admission to special care nursery
- immediate maternal psychological outcomes: e.g., anxiety during labor, negative rating of experience
- longer-term maternal outcomes: e.g., postpartum depression, difficulty mothering.
Pre-determined
outcomes for subgroup analyses were: analgesia/anesthesia, way of
giving birth (spontaneous, with vacuum extraction or forceps,
cesarean), low 5-minute Apgar scores, dissatisfaction or negative view
of childbirth experience, and postpartum depression.
Results of main comparisonNumerous graphs available within the full "Continuous Support..." review
(PDF) compare all data that were available from all included studies
for the specified outcomes of interest. Considering outcomes reported
in at least 4 studies involving at least 1,000 women, women who received continuous support were less likely than women who did not to:
- have regional analgesia
- have any analgesia/anesthesia
- give birth with vacuum extraction or forceps
- give birth by cesarean
- report dissatisfaction or a negative rating of their experience.
Women receiving continuous support were more likely than those who did not to give birth spontaneously — with neither cesarean nor vacuum extraction nor forceps.
Again, considering outcomes reported in 4 or more studies involving at least 1,000 women, continuous support was neither associated with shorter length of labor nor with decreased likelihood of:
- artificial oxytocin during labor
- low 5-minute Apgar scores
- newborn admission to special care nursery
- postpartum reports of severe labor pain.
Results of subgroup analysesData were not available to compare subgroups with respect to postpartum depression. Here are other subgroup analysis results:
- policies about companions of the women's own choice:
continuous support appeared to have a stronger impact on
analgesia/anesthesia use, spontaneous birth, and cesarean birth in
settings in which other support was not permitted; the subgroups were
not significantly different with respect to instrumental birth, low
5-minute Apgar scores, and dissatisfaction
- policies about epidural analgesia: continuous support
appeared to have a stronger impact on use of analgesia/anesthesia,
spontaneous birth, and cesarean birth when epidural analgesia was not
routinely available; the subgroups were not significantly different
with respect to instrumental birth, low 5-minute Apgar scores, and
dissatisfaction
- policies about continuous EFM: continuous support appeared
to have a stronger impact on spontaneous birth when EFM was not
routine; the subgroups were not significantly different with respect to
analgesia/anesthesia, instrumental birth, cesarean birth, low 5-minute
Apgar scores, and dissatisfaction
- type of caregiver: continuous support appeared to have a
stronger impact on anesthesia/analgesia, spontaneous birth, and
instrumental birth when the caregiver was not a hospital employee; it
only had an impact on cesarean birth when the caregiver was not a
hospital employee; the subgroups were not significantly different with
respect to dissatisfaction
- timing in the onset of continuous support: continuous
support appeared to have a stronger impact on analgesia/anesthesia,
spontaneous birth, and cesarean birth when it began before active
labor; the subgroups were not significantly different with respect to
instrumental birth and dissatisfaction.
Reviewers' conclusions: implications for practice, in part "Continuous
support during labour should be the norm, rather than the exception.
All women should be allowed and encouraged to have support people with
them continuously during labour. In general, continuous support from a
caregiver during labour appears to confer the greatest benefits when
the provider is not an employee of the institution, when epidural
analgesia is not routinely used, and when support begins in early
labour."
Reviewers' conclusions: implications for researchThe following settings warrant further research:
- resource-constrained countries.
The following outcomes warrant further research:
- effects on mothers' and babies' health and well-being in the postpartum period
- economic analysis of relative costs and benefits.
The following models warrant further research:
- North American doula model, with relationship established during
pregnancy, support during labor, and support in the postpartum period
- support by a female family member
- support by the husband/partner.
Citation for this reviewHodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr G J, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth [PDF]. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003766. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.
About the Cochrane CollaborationTo learn more about the
Cochrane Collaboration, an international organization that prepares and
keeps up-to-date systematic reviews in many areas of health and
medicine, visit the Cochrane website.
Most recent page update: 7/30/2007
© 2010 Childbirth Connection. All rights reserved.
Childbirth Connection is a national not-for-profit organization founded in 1918 as Maternity Center Association. Our mission is to improve the quality of maternity care through research, education, advocacy and policy. Childbirth Connection promotes safe, effective and satisfying evidence-based maternity care and is a voice for the needs and interests of childbearing families.
|
News and Features
New VBAC Guidlines
ACOG has just issued new Guidlines for VBAC. What changed? What continues?
We've Moved!
On July 1, 2010, the Childbirth Connection office moved to 260 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10016. All other contact information is unchanged.
New Pregnancy Video Library AvailableOur new Video Library features links to a wealth of resources for health professionals as well as for women who are planning pregnancy, are pregnant or are new mothers. Visit the Video Library 
"2020 Vision" and "Blueprint for Action" Reports Available
Leaders from across the U.S. health care system have prepared several reports for improving the maternity care system. Learn about Transforming Maternity Care project Read the "2020 Vision" Read the "Blueprint for Action" Read the Consumer Workgroup report Help implement Blueprint recommendations Listen to report release event audio, 1/2010
Help Transform Maternity Care!
 Please join our efforts to make quality maternity care a top national priority. Your support will help make the transformation possible.
View 2010 Supporter Roster
Rising Maternal Mortality
Analysis of maternal mortality data for the state of California, with 14% of the nation's births, strongly suggests that maternal mortality is increasing in tandem with rising rates of cesarean section and obesity.
Read article about maternal mortality in California
Read companion Q&A
Updated Maternity Care Statistics Available
A fact sheet summarizes U.S. maternity care trends and figures from the latest federal reports. A new table updates state-level maternity statistics. These update background information in the 2008 Milbank Report on Evidence-Based Maternity Care.
Get the fact sheet
Get state-level statistics (PDF)
Read Evidence-Based
Maternity Care
US Cochrane Center (USCC)/Consumers United for Evidence-based Healthcare (CUE)
Visit the USCC/CUE website for the latest pregnancy and childbirth systematic reviews.
Evidence-Based Maternity Care Report Released
A major new report takes stock of the U.S. maternity care system and finds great opportunities for improvement. Childbirth Connection collaborated with the Reforming States Group and the Milbank Memorial Fund to develop the report.
Learn more, get the report 
Read companion USA Today article
Read the USA Today article
Read the Consumer Reports story
Take the Consumer Reports quiz
Read Our Bodies Our Blog entry
New Mothers Speak Out National Report Released
The latest report in Childbirth Connection's Listening to Mothers series is now available. Get an eye-opening look at the reality of life as a mother of young children in the United States, based on national surveys conducted by Harris Interactive.
Learn more, get the report
Read the Wall Street Journal story and listen to the podcast
Download Quick Facts (PDF)
"Too much to do, too little time, especially since it is so inviting to just gaze at the baby."
-Listening to Mothers® survey participant
Every woman has the right to choose a midwife or a physician as her maternity care provider. Both caregivers skilled in normal childbearing and caregivers skilled in complications are needed to ensure quality care for all.
|
